Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/102831
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDann, L.en
dc.contributor.authorPaterson, J.en
dc.contributor.authorNewton, K.en
dc.contributor.authorOliver, R.en
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, J.en
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.citationPlos One, 2016; 11(1):1-19en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/102831-
dc.description.abstractMicrobial interactions are important for ecosystem function, but occur at the microscale and so are difficult to observe. Previous studies in marine systems have shown significant shifts in microbial community abundance and composition over scales of micrometres to centimetres. This study investigates the microscale abundance distributions of virus-like particles (VLPs) and prokaryotes in the lower reaches of a river to determine the extent to which microscale microbial patchiness exists in freshwater systems. Here we report local hotspots surrounded by gradients that reach a maximum 80 and 107 fold change in abundance over 0.9 cm for prokaryotic and VLP subpopulations. Changes in prokaryotic and VLP hotspots were tightly coupled. There were no gradients at tens of centimetres across the boundary layers, which is consistent with strong mixing and turbulence-driven aggregation found in river systems. Quantification of the patchiness shows a marked asymmetry with patches 10 times greater than background common, but depletions being rare or absent in most samples. This consistent asymmetry suggests that coldspots depleted by grazing and lysis are rapidly mixed to background concentrations, while the prevalence of hotspots indicates persistence against disruption. The hotspot to coldspot relative abundance may be useful for understanding microbial river dynamics. The patchiness indicates that the mean- field approach of bulk phase sampling misses the microbially relevant community variation and may underestimate the concentrations of these important microbial groups.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityLisa M. Dann, James S. Paterson, Kelly Newton, Rod Oliver, James G. Mitchellen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen
dc.rights© 2016 Dann et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.subjectProkaryotic cells; spatial autocorrelation; fresh water; bacteria; Lysis (medicine); rivers; flow cytometry; community ecologyen
dc.titleDistributions of virus-like particles and prokaryotes within microenvironmentsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030055423en
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0146984en
dc.identifier.pubid263464-
pubs.library.collectionBiochemistry publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS10en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidOliver, R. [0000-0003-2238-1740]en
Appears in Collections:Biochemistry publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_102831.pdfPublished version3.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.