Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/103952
Type: Journal article
Title: Questioning circumcisionism: feminism, gender equity, and human rights
Author: Wisdom, T.
Citation: Righting Wrongs: A Journal of Human Rights, 2012; 2(1):1-32
Issue Date: 2012
ISSN: 2167-1680
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Travis Wisdom
Abstract: For decades feminists worldwide have addressed and combated the harmful practice of female genital mutilation, while largely overlooking male circumcision as genital mutilation. The practices of male and female circumcisions are the result of mainstream ideologies that shape our understandings and consciousness of sexuality and health. The larger framework within which circumcision operates is referred to as “circumcisionism.” Circumcisionism is the hegemonic view that genital circumcision is a normative and acceptable practice. This paper focuses on circumcision of non-consenting male minors, arguing that it is genital mutilation and that the practice should be a feminist issue, as well as a human rights concern. Feminists are encouraged to recognize male circumcision and that Western culture embraces genital mutilation as a perfunctory, yet harmful practice.
Rights: © Copyright 2012 Righting Wrongs: A Journal of Human Rights. All rights reserved.
Published version: http://blogs.webster.edu/humanrights/2012/05/01/questioning-circumcisionism-feminism-gender-equity-and-human-rights/
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.