Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/104144
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, G.-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationAdelaide Law Review, 2009; 30(2):195-195-
dc.identifier.issn0065-1915-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/104144-
dc.description.abstractThis article gives an overview of the reasons why the Torrens system cannot be considered a German import, having regard not so much to the detail of times and dates (which I have examined in detail elsewhere) but to aspects of early South Australian society which tend to disprove a crucial element in the case for considering it a German import: namely, that early South Australians would not have accepted the Torrens system had they known the ‘truth’ that it was of German origin. This accusation is a risible under-estimation of the broadmindedness of early South Australians, and the simple reason they were not told that it was of German origin is that it was not. A response is also provided to the accusation that Torrens was just a self-serving hypocrite when he claimed to be undertaking conveyancing reform in the interests of the public at large.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGreg Taylor-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherUniversity of Adelaide Press-
dc.rightsCopyright status unknown-
dc.source.urihttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AdelLawRw/2009/11.html-
dc.titleThe Torrens system - definitely not German-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidTaylor, G. [0000-0002-9393-9134]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.