Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/104397
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: A capitalising foreign policy: Regulatory geographies and transnationalised state projects
Author: Chacko, P.
Jayasuriya, K.
Citation: European Journal of International Relations, 2018; 24(1):82-105
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Issue Date: 2018
ISSN: 1354-0661
1460-3713
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Priya Chacko, Kanishka Jayasuriya
Abstract: Proposals for regional economic integration, namely, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and the One Belt One Road proposal, have recently been driving the security dynamics of the Asian region. To explain the growing ‘economic’ focus of states’ foreign policies, we need to go beyond the dominant approaches in International Relations and International Political Economy, which are limited in their analytical power because they often make a distinction between politics/security and economics, and prioritise one over the other, rather than seeing them as internally related. Drawing on Leon Trotsky’s theory of ‘uneven and combined development’ and Nicos Poulantzas’s notion of ‘internalised transformations’, we develop a ‘Poulantzian-uneven and combined development’ framework to argue that the increased focus on economics in foreign policymaking represents a fundamental change related to the transnationalisation of capitalist state-building projects. The paper argues that while the Trans-Pacific Partnership reflected an attempt by the Obama administration to fashion a new stage in the transnationalisation of American capital, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and One Belt One Road proposal reflect an emerging China-centred transnationalised state project. We characterise the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and One Belt One Road proposal as constituting different forms of a particular type of geoeconomic strategy called ‘regulatory geographies’ because they entail the export of distinctive modes of regulatory governance that aim to overcome key contradictions of uneven and combined capitalist development in the US and China. As the recent demise of the Trans-Pacific Partnership with the election of Donald Trump shows, however, these transnationalised state projects generate resistance and contestation within, as well as between, states.
Keywords: China; One Belt One Road; Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership; Trans- Pacific Partnership; uneven and combined development; US
Description: First Published March 21, 2017
Rights: © The Author(s) 2017
RMID: 0030067761
DOI: 10.1177/1354066117694702
Appears in Collections:Politics publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_104397.pdfAccepted version554.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.