Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/105014
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | From Kantianism to aesthetic hedonism: aesthetic pleasure revised |
Author: | McMahon, J. |
Citation: | Australasian Philosophical Review, 2017; 1(1):1-5 |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
Issue Date: | 2017 |
ISSN: | 2474-0500 2474-0519 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Jennifer A. McMahon |
Abstract: | No matter how unintuitive it might seem that aesthetic pleasure should be the point where art and morality meet (in terms of philosophical structure and import), this is a noteworthy possibility that has been overshadowed by aestheticians’ more visible concerns. Here I briefly survey relevant strands in the literature over the past century, before introducing themes covered in this inaugural issue of Australasian Philosophical Review. |
Rights: | © 2017 Australasian Association of Philosophy |
DOI: | 10.1080/24740500.2017.1296403 |
Grant ID: | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP150103143 |
Published version: | http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24740500.2017.1296403 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 8 Philosophy publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.