Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/108309
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCullity, G.en
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.citationPhilosophical Studies, 2016; 173(12):3399-3411en
dc.identifier.issn0031-8116en
dc.identifier.issn1573-0883en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/108309-
dc.description.abstractThis critical study of John Broome’s Rationality Through Reasoning (i) raises some questions about the various requirements of rationality Broome formulates, pointing out some apparent gaps and counterexamples; (ii) proposes a general description of rationality that is broadly consistent with Broome’s requirements while providing them with a unifying justification, filling the gaps, and removing the counterexamples; and (iii) presents two objections to the book’s broader argument concerning the nature and importance of reasoning.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGarrett Cullityen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016en
dc.subjectRationality; reasoning; reasons; normativity; rule-following; intentionen
dc.titleDescribing rationalityen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030063191en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11098-016-0717-0en
dc.identifier.pubid284018-
pubs.library.collectionPhilosophy publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS14en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Philosophy publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_108309.pdfRestricted Access249.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.