Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/108366
Type: Journal article
Title: Rethinking leading: the directive, non-directive divide
Author: Caruso, D.
Wheatcroft, J.
Krumrey-Quinn, J.
Citation: Criminal Law Journal, 2015; 5:340-346
Publisher: Law Book Company Limited
Issue Date: 2015
ISSN: 0314-1160
1567-536X
Statement of
Responsibility: 
David Caruso, Jacqueline Wheatcroft and James Krumrey-Quinn
Abstract: There is a dearth of legal and psychological consideration of the leading question during the trial process. This article argues the current approach to the leading question does not assist or promote the accuracy of witness evidence, particularly witnesses likely to be affected by such questions: children. We advance a revised definition of leading, differentiating between directive and non-directive questions. Directive questioning is the primary mischief to eliciting accurate witness testimony; we propose its presumptive prohibition. Non-directive leading is of less concern and should be the leading form open to use in cross-examination.
Rights: Copyright status unknown
RMID: 0030065979
Published version: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3002664/
Appears in Collections:Law publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_108366.pdfRestricted Access100.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.