Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/108370
Type: Journal article
Title: The basis of the 'basis rule': the role of the basis rule in the admissibility of expert opinion
Author: Phan, T.
Caruso, D.
Citation: Federal Law Review, 2015; 43(2):313-337
Publisher: Australian National University, Faculty of Law
Issue Date: 2015
ISSN: 0067-205X
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Trang Phan and David Caruso
Abstract: The 'basis rule' is, in general terms, a rule which restricts expert witnesses to giving opinion evidence in respect of which there is or will be proof, by other admissible evidence, of the facts and assumptions upon which the opinion is based. There has been no clear consensus as to whether the basis rule exists either at common law or under the Uniform Evidence Legislation, or whether the rule goes to admissibility or weight. This article examines the jurisprudence, with a particular focus on the recent High Court decision of Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar. The authors argue that the controversy surrounding the basis rule has been the result of a misunderstanding and misconstruction of the rule. They argue that the conflict may be resolved by understanding the basis rule as simply a rearticulation, in the specific context of expert evidence, of the requirement that evidence must be relevant to be admissible. The weight of that expert evidence remains to be determined in accordance with ordinary principles.
Rights: © Australian National University Faculty of Law
RMID: 0030041568
Published version: http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=515839306727740;res=IELHSS
Appears in Collections:Law publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_108370.pdfRestricted Access292.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.