Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/109548
Type: Journal article
Title: 'Defining characteristics' and the forgotten 'Court'
Author: McDonald, S.
Citation: The Sydney Law Review, 2016; 38(2):207-229
Publisher: Sydney Law School
Issue Date: 2016
ISSN: 0082-0512
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Stephen McDonald
Abstract: This article outlines the High Court of Australia’s development of limitations on state legislative power to affect state courts and, in particular, the Court’s acceptance of the concept of ‘defining characteristics’ of a ‘court’ as a touchstone for constitutional validity. It then traces the history of one particular unusual colonial court, the Court of Appeals for the Province of South Australia, and discusses the impact of that court’s existence on the terms of ch III of the Australian Constitution. The characteristics of the historical Court of Appeals are contrasted with the modern idealised constitutional conception of a ‘court’. The article concludes with a critique of the failure of the ‘defining characteristics’ approach adequately to explain or to take into account the historical existence of the Court of Appeals, and identifies some ways in which it might be more satisfactorily accommodated within, and might influence, ch III jurisprudence.
Keywords: Defining characteristics; court; Court of Appeals for the Province of South Australia; Australian Constitution
Rights: © 2016 Sydney Law Review and author.
RMID: 0030055739
Published version: http://sydney.edu.au/law/slr/slr_38/slr38_2/SLRv38n2McDonald.pdf
Appears in Collections:Law publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_109548.pdfRestricted Access1.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.