Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/114538
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gieroba, T. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Williams, N. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Antoniou, G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cundy, P. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | ANZ Journal of Surgery, 2017; 87(4):282-286 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1445-1433 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1445-2197 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/114538 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Mini C-arm image intensifiers (IIs) are promoted to permit lower radiation dose than traditional IIs with a lower purchase price and without the need for a radiographer, saving time. In real-world usage, radiation dose is not always lower. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data for 620 children undergoing forearm fracture reduction in theatre was undertaken. Imaging was performed with the Fluoroscan mini C-arm or a comparison traditional II. Radiation dose and theatre time were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in radiation dose as measured by dose-area product (0.013 versus 0.014 Gy.cm², P = 0.22). We noted an inverse association between operator experience and radiation dose. The mini C-arm allowed a shorter procedure time (26 versus 30 min, P < 0.001) and theatre time (13 versus 16 min, P < 0.001). Redisplacement rates were similar (1.3 versus 2.2%). The Fluoroscan is AU$120 000 cheaper to purchase and AU$35 283 cheaper to run per year than the comparison II. Consultants had a 14% lower dose-area product (0.012 versus 0.014 Gy.cm², P < 0.001) and 18% shorter screening time (8 versus 9.8 s, P < 0.001) than registrars. Conclusion: The Fluoroscan mini C-arm II does not demonstrate a radiation saving during closed reductions of paediatric forearm fractures but allows shorter procedures and theatre time with similar re-displacement rates. The purchase price is lower than a traditional II. We noted that operator experience reduces radiation dose. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Tom J. Gieroba, Nicole Williams, Georgia Antoniou and Peter J. Cund | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Wiley | - |
dc.rights | © 2016 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.13842 | - |
dc.subject | Bone; cast; fluoroscopy; forearm injury; fracture; manipulation; orthopaedic; surgical | - |
dc.title | Mini C-arm: faster, cheaper, safer? | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ans.13842 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Gieroba, T. [0000-0002-1789-8211] | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Williams, N. [0000-0001-9451-4456] | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Cundy, P. [0000-0002-8050-6153] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 3 Orthopaedics and Trauma publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.