Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/114694
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrands, J.en
dc.contributor.authorGarvey, G.en
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, K.en
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, J.en
dc.contributor.authorChynoweth, J.en
dc.contributor.authorWallington, I.en
dc.contributor.authorMorris, B.en
dc.contributor.authorKnott, V.en
dc.contributor.authorWebster, S.en
dc.contributor.authorKinsella, L.en
dc.contributor.authorCondon, J.en
dc.contributor.authorZorbas, H.en
dc.date.issued2018en
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018; 15(5):942-1-942-16en
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601en
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/114694-
dc.descriptionPublished: 9 May 2018en
dc.description.abstractIndigenous Australians experience a substantially higher cancer mortality rate than non-Indigenous Australians. While cancer outcomes are improving for non-Indigenous Australians, they are worsening for Indigenous Australians. Reducing this disparity requires evidence-based and culturally-appropriate guidance. The purpose of this paper is to describe an initiative by Cancer Australia and Menzies School of Health Research (Menzies) to develop Australia’s first National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cancer Framework using a process of co-design with relevant stakeholders. The initiative was guided by three core principles: achieving policy-relevant evidence-based outcomes; engaging and maintaining trust with Indigenous Australians at every phase; and employing best-practice and appropriate research methods. Four components of research comprised the Framework development: evidence review; multifaceted stakeholder consultation and input; triangulation of findings; and direct stakeholder input in drafting and refining the Framework. The evidence review confirmed the increasing burden of cancer on Indigenous Australians, while stakeholder consultations facilitated comprehensive input from those with lived experience. The consultations revealed issues not identified in existing literature, and gave different emphases of priority, thus reinforcing the value of including stakeholder perspectives. This paper focuses primarily on documenting the methods used; findings are presented only in order to illustrate the results of the process. The published Framework is available at www.canceraustralia.gov.au; further description and analyses of findings from the consultations will be published elsewhere. The logistics inherent in large-scale consultation are considerable. However, the quality of data and the foundation for sustained partnership with stakeholders and knowledge translation vastly outweighed the challenges. The process of wide-ranging stakeholder consultation described in this paper offers a model for other areas of national and international Indigenous priority setting and policy and practice development that meets the needs of those most affected. The Framework, through the establishment of an agreed, shared and evidence-based agenda, provides guidance for jurisdictional cancer plans, optimal care pathways, and program and service planning for the multiple players across all levels of the health system.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJenny Brands, Gail Garvey, Kate Anderson, Joan Cunningham, Jennifer Chynoweth, Isabella Wallington, Bronwyn Morris, Vikki Knott, Samantha Webster, Lauren Kinsella, John Condon and Helen Zorbasen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPI AGen
dc.rights© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en
dc.subjectIndigenous health; cancer; framework; consultation; collaboration; research translationen
dc.titleDevelopment of a national Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cancer framework: a shared process to guide effective policy and practiceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030098262en
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph15050942en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1041111en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1105399en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1058244en
dc.identifier.pubid419619-
pubs.library.collectionPsychology publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS03en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_114694.pdfPublished version600.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.