Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/115157
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGill, L.en
dc.contributor.authorMcCaffrey, N.en
dc.contributor.authorCameron, I.en
dc.contributor.authorRatcliffe, J.en
dc.contributor.authorKaambwa, B.en
dc.contributor.authorCorlis, M.en
dc.contributor.authorFiebig, J.en
dc.contributor.authorGresham, M.en
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citationHealth and Social Care in the Community, 2017; 25(2):478-491en
dc.identifier.issn0966-0410en
dc.identifier.issn1365-2524en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/115157-
dc.description.abstractThe study aimed to identify the shared issues and challenges being experienced by staff, their clients and informal carers, with the introduction of Consumer Directed Care (CDC). Secondary analysis was undertaken of data that had been initially collected, via semi-structured in-depth interviews, to inform the development of a discrete choice experiment. The raw staff and client/carer data were re-examined using an iterative inductive process. The analysis focused on locating the shared themes and differences between the participant groups based on their CDC experience. The data were also assessed for difficulties or barriers that impacted on the service. Four broad shared themes were derived: culture, role change, operational systems and resourcing, but with a range of diverse and sometimes conflicting sub-themes between the different participant groups. Differences can be linked to participant role in the service chain, with discordance emerging between what has been traditionally offered and what might be possible. This investigation occurred during the period in which services were transitioning from a traditional aged care service model to a new model of service provision requiring considerable industry change. We conclude that existing industry regulation, culture and practice supports an established service model in Australia that arguably makes translation of the objectives of CDC difficult.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityLiz Gill, Nikki McCaffrey, Ian D. Cameron, Julie Ratcliffe, Billingsley Kaambwa, Megan Corlis, Jeff Fiebig and Meredith Greshamen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.rights© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltden
dc.subjectChallenges; Consumer directed care (CDC); culture; operational systems; resourcing; role changeen
dc.titleConsumer Directed Care in Australia: early perceptions and experiences of staff, clients and carersen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030098646en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/hsc.12328en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP110200079en
dc.identifier.pubid439296-
pubs.library.collectionPublic Health publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS03en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidMcCaffrey, N. [0000-0003-3684-3723]en
dc.identifier.orcidRatcliffe, J. [0000-0001-7365-1988]en
dc.identifier.orcidKaambwa, B. [0000-0002-2128-3404]en
Appears in Collections:Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.