Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/116719
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNouhaud, P.en
dc.contributor.authorTobler, R.en
dc.contributor.authorNolte, V.en
dc.contributor.authorSchlötterer, C.en
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.citationEcology and Evolution, 2016; 6(20):7169-7175en
dc.identifier.issn2045-7758en
dc.identifier.issn2045-7758en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/116719-
dc.description.abstractExperimental evolution is a powerful tool to study adaptation under controlled conditions. Laboratory natural selection experiments mimic adaptation in the wild with better-adapted genotypes having more offspring. Because the selected traits are frequently not known, adaptation is typically measured as fitness increase by comparing evolved populations against an unselected reference population maintained in a laboratory environment. With adaptation to the laboratory conditions and genetic drift, however, it is not clear to what extent such comparisons provide unbiased estimates of adaptation. Alternatively, ancestral variation could be preserved in isofemale lines that can be combined to reconstitute the ancestral population. Here, we assess the impact of selection on alleles segregating in newly established Drosophila isofemale lines. We reconstituted two populations from isofemale lines and compared them to two original ancestral populations (AP) founded from the same lines shortly after collection. No significant allele frequency changes could be detected between both AP and simulations showed that drift had a low impact compared to Pool-Seq-associated sampling effects. We conclude that laboratory selection on segregating variation in isofemale lines is too weak to have detectable effects, which validates ancestral population reconstitution from isofemale lines as an unbiased approach for measuring adaptation in evolved populations.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityPierre Nouhaud, Ray Tobler, Viola Nolte, Christian Schlöttereren
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen
dc.rights© 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectAdaptation; evolve and resequence; experimental evolution; isofemale line; whole‐genome sequencingen
dc.titleAncestral population reconstitution from isofemale lines as a tool for experimental evolutionen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030066442en
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ece3.2402en
dc.identifier.pubid276502-
pubs.library.collectionEcology, Evolution and Landscape Science publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS10en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidTobler, R. [0000-0002-4603-1473]en
Appears in Collections:Ecology, Evolution and Landscape Science publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_116719.pdfPublished Version265.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.