Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/117443
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Economic evaluations in community aged care: a systematic review
Author: Bulamu, N.
Kaambwa, B.
Ratcliffe, J.
Citation: BMC Health Services Research, 2018; 18(1):1-13
Publisher: BioMed Central
Issue Date: 2018
ISSN: 1472-6963
1472-6963
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Norma B. Bulamu, Billingsley Kaambwa and Julie Ratcliffe
Abstract: Background: This paper reports the methods and findings from a systematic review of economic evaluations conducted in the community aged care sector between 2000 and 2016. Methods: Online databases searched were PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and web of science, CINAHL and informit. Studies were included if they 1) were full economic evaluations that compared both the costs and outcomes of two or more interventions 2) in study population of people aged 65 years and over 3) dependent older people living in the community 4) alternatives being compared were care models or service delivery interventions in the community aged care sector (a group of programs that have been established as a support system to allow older people to remain living in their own homes for as long as possible, as an alternative to institutional or residential care) and 5) published in the English language between 2000 and November 2016. Results: Eleven studies reporting upon economic evaluations of service delivery interventions in community aged care were identified; the majority of which were undertaken in Europe. Critical appraisal of the identified studies highlighted the methodological rigour in these evaluations. Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the paucity of economic evaluation studies conducted to date in the community aged care sector. The findings highlight the importance of cost utility analysis methodology as it allows for a uniform outcome measure, that facilitates the comparison of different interventions. In addition, multi-attribute utility measures that represent those quality of life domains that are most important to older people should be used and attention must be paid to the inclusion of informal care costs and outcomes as this is a key resource in community aged care service delivery.
Keywords: Economic evaluation; community aged care; systematic review; aged
Rights: © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
RMID: 0030105974
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3785-3
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP110200079
Appears in Collections:Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_117443.pdfPublished version920.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.