Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||The importance of spatio‐temporal variability in irrigation inputs for hydrological modelling of irrigated catchments|
|Citation:||Water Resources Research, 2018; 54(9):6792-6821|
|Publisher:||American Geophysical Union|
|David McInerney, Mark Thyer, Dmitri Kavetski, Faith Githui, Thabo Thayalakumaran, Min Liu, George Kuczera|
|Abstract:||Irrigation contributes substantially to the water balance and environmental condition of many agriculturally productive catchments. This study focuses on the representation of spatio‐temporal variability of irrigation depths in irrigation schedule models. Irrigation variability arises due to differences in farmers' irrigation practices, yet its effects on distributed hydrological predictions used to inform management decisions are currently poorly understood. Using a case study of the Barr Creek catchment in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia, we systematically compare four irrigation schedule models, including uniform vs variable in space, and continuous‐time vs event‐based representations. We evaluate simulated irrigation at hydrological response unit and catchment scales, and demonstrate the impact of irrigation schedules on the simulations of streamflow, evapotranspiration and potential recharge obtained using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). A new spatially‐variable event‐based irrigation schedule model is developed. When used to provide irrigation inputs to SWAT, this new model: (i) reduces the over‐estimation of actual evapotranspiration that occurs with spatially‐uniform continuous‐time irrigation assumptions (biases reduced from ∼40% to ∼2%) and (ii) better reproduces the fast streamflow response to rainfall events compared to spatially‐uniform event‐based irrigation assumptions (seasonally‐adjusted Nash‐Sutcliffe Efficiency improves from 0.15 to 0.56). The stochastic nature of the new model allows representing irrigation schedule uncertainty, which improves the characterization of uncertainty in simulated catchment streamflow and can be used for uncertainty decomposition. More generally, this study highlights the importance of spatio‐temporal variability of inputs to distributed hydrological models and the importance of using multi‐variate response data to test and refine environmental models.|
|Keywords:||Irrigation schedule model; distributed hydrological model; spatiotemporal variability; streamflow simulation; uncertainty quantification; SWAT|
|Rights:||© 2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.|
|Appears in Collections:||Civil and Environmental Engineering publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.