Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/118148
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, H.en
dc.contributor.authorRecknagel, F.en
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, W.en
dc.contributor.authorFrizenschaf, J.en
dc.contributor.authorYing, H.en
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, M.en
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.citationScience of the Total Environment, 2019; 662:254-265en
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697en
dc.identifier.issn1879-1026en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/118148-
dc.description.abstractQuantifying the water quantity and quality variations resulting from human induced activities is important for policy makers in view of increasing water scarcity and water pollution. Simple models can be robust tools in estimating the runoff from catchments, but do they also sufficiently reflect complex physio-chemical processes required for spatially-explicit simulation of soil-water interactions, and the resulting pollutant responses in catchments? Do these models respond sensitive to the impacts of different land use change representations? These questions are considered by applying the semi-distributed process-based catchment models SWAT and SOURCE to the Sixth Creek catchment in South Australia. Both models used similar data whereas inputs for SOURCE were generated from land-use based Functional Units (FUs), while FUs for SWAT were based on land use, soil and slope combinations. After satisfying calibration of both models for the outlet station of the catchment, the simulated flow by SOURCE produced high goodness of fit metrics, while nutrient loads simulated by SWAT were more realistic. Both models benefitted from using locally available Potential Evapotranspiration data for calibrating the hydrology. Scenarios of intensified land uses by two models showed more credible results for sediment and nutrient loads with the static approach when simulating the linear rather than the non-linear land use changes. The study has shown that informing decisions on the hydrology at catchment scale is well suited to less-complex models, whereas decisions on impact of land use change on water quality in catchments are better suited by models with process descriptions for soil-water interactions.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityHong Hanh Nguyen, Friedrich Recknagel, Wayne Meyer, Jacqueline Frizenschaf, He Ying, Matthew S. Gibbsen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BVen
dc.rights© 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.subjectLand use change; Pollution loads; Potential evapotranspiration; SOURCE; SWAT; Streamflowen
dc.titleComparison of the alternative models SOURCE and SWAT for predicting catchment streamflow, sediment and nutrient loads under the effect of land use changesen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030107603en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.286en
dc.identifier.pubid457778-
pubs.library.collectionEcology, Evolution and Landscape Science publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS05en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidRecknagel, F. [0000-0002-1028-9413]en
dc.identifier.orcidMeyer, W. [0000-0003-3477-9385]en
dc.identifier.orcidGibbs, M. [0000-0001-6653-8688]en
Appears in Collections:Ecology, Evolution and Landscape Science publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.