Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/118455
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcAfee, D.en
dc.contributor.authorBishop, M.en
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.citationOecologia, 2019; 189(4):1095-1106en
dc.identifier.issn0029-8549en
dc.identifier.issn1432-1939en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/118455-
dc.description.abstractThe effective use of ecosystem engineers to conserve biodiversity requires an understanding of the types of resources an engineer modifies, and how these modifications vary with biotic and abiotic context. In the intertidal zone, oysters engineer ecological communities by reducing temperature and desiccation stress, enhancing the availability of hard substrate for attachment, and by ameliorating biological interactions such as competition and predation. Using a field experiment manipulating shading, predator access and availability of shell substrate at four sites distributed over 900 km of east Australian coastline, we investigated how the relative importance of these mechanisms of facilitation vary spatially. At all sites, and irrespective of environmental conditions, the provision of hard substrate by oysters enhanced the abundance and richness of invertebrates, in particular epibionts (barnacles and oyster spat) and grazing gastropods. Mobile arthropods utilised the habitat provided by disarticulated dead oysters more than live oyster habitat, whereas the abundance of polychaetes and bivalves were much greater in live oysters, suggesting the oyster filter-feeding activity is important for these groups. In warmer estuaries, shading by oysters had a larger effect on biodiversity, whereas in cooler estuaries, the provision of a predation refuge by oysters played a more important role. Such knowledge of how ecosystem engineering effects vary across environmental gradients can help inform management strategies targeting ecosystem resilience via the amelioration of specific environmental stressors, or conservation of specific community assemblages.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDominic McAfee, Melanie J. Bishopen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.rights© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019en
dc.subjectEcosystem engineer; Ecosystem-based management; Foundation species; Intertidal; Positive interactionen
dc.titleThe mechanisms by which oysters facilitate invertebrates vary across environmental gradientsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030110418en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00442-019-04359-3en
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP150101363en
dc.identifier.pubid463524-
pubs.library.collectionEcology, Evolution and Landscape Science publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS10en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Ecology, Evolution and Landscape Science publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.