Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/122569
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Cancer treatment and the risk of cancer death among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal South Australians: analysis of a matched cohort study
Author: Banham, D.
Roder, D.
Eckert, M.
Howard, N.J.
Canuto, K.
Brown, A.
CanDAD Aboriginal Community Reference Group and other CanDAD Investigators
Citation: BMC Health Services Research, 2019; 19(1):771-1-771-16
Publisher: Springer Nature
Issue Date: 2019
ISSN: 1472-6963
1472-6963
Statement of
Responsibility: 
David Banham, David Roder, Marion Eckert, Natasha J. Howard, Karla Canuto, Alex Brown, and for the CanDAD Aboriginal Community Reference Group and other CanDAD Investigators
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians have poorer cancer outcomes than other Australians. Comparatively little is known of the type and amount of cancer treatment provided to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and the consequences for cancer survival. This study quantifies the influence of surgical, systemic and radiotherapy treatment on risk of cancer death among matched cohorts of cancer cases and, the comparative exposure of cohorts to these treatments. METHODS:Cancers registered among Aboriginal South Australians in 1990-2010 (N = 777) were matched with randomly selected non-Indigenous cases by sex, birth and diagnostic year, and primary site, then linked to administrative cancer treatment for the period from 2 months before to 13 months after diagnosis. Competing risk regression summarised associations of Indigenous status, geographic remoteness, comorbidities, cancer stage and treatment exposure with risk of cancer death. RESULTS:Fewer Aboriginal cases had localised disease at diagnosis (37.2% versus 50.2%) and they were less likely to: experience hospitalisation with cancer diagnosis, unadjusted odds ratio (UOR) = 0.76; 95%CI = 0.59-0.98; have surgery UOR = 0.65; 95%CI = 0.53-0.80; systemic therapies UOR = 0.64; 95%CI = 0.52-0.78; or radiotherapy, UOR = 0.76; 95%CI = 0.63-0.94. Localised disease carried lower risk of cancer death compared to advanced cases receiving surgery or systemic therapies, SHR = 0.34; 95%CI = 0.25-0.47 and SHR = 0.35; 95%CI = 0.25-0.48. Advanced disease and no treatment carried higher risk of cancer death, SHR = 1.82; 95%CI = 1.26-2.63. CONCLUSION:The effects of treatment did not differ between Aboriginal and non-Indigenous cohorts. However, comparatively less exposure to surgical and systemic treatments among Aboriginal cancer cases further complicated the disadvantages associated with geographic remoteness, advanced stage of disease and co-morbid conditions at diagnosis and add to disparities in cancer death. System level responses to improving access, utilisation and quality of effective treatments are needed to improve survival after cancer diagnosis.
Keywords: Cancer treatment; Aboriginal; indigenous; cancer; disparity; survival
Rights: © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
RMID: 1000004286
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4534-y
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/GNT1072243
Appears in Collections:Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_122569.pdfPublished version949.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.