Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics
Author: Pollock, D.
Davies, E.
Peters, M.
Tricco, A.
Alexander, L.
McInerney, P.
Godfrey, C.
Khalil, H.
Munn, Z.
Citation: Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2021; 77(4):2102-2113
Publisher: Wiley
Issue Date: 2021
ISSN: 0309-2402
Statement of
Danielle Pollock, Ellen L. Davies, Micah D. J. Peters, Andrea C. Tricco, Lyndsay Alexander, Patricia McInerney, Christina M. Godfrey, Hanan Khalil, Zachary Munn
Abstract: Aim: The aim of this study is to discuss the available methodological resources and best-practice guidelines for the development and completion of scoping reviews relevant to nursing and midwifery policy, practice, and research. Design: Discussion Paper. Data Sources: Scoping reviews that exemplify best practice are explored with reference to the recently updated JBI scoping review guide (2020) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review extension (PRISMA-ScR). Implications for nursing and midwifery: Scoping reviews are an increasingly common form of evidence synthesis. They are used to address broad research questions and to map evidence from a variety of sources. Scoping reviews are a useful form of evidence synthesis for those in nursing and midwifery and present opportunities for researchers to review a broad array of evidence and resources. However, scoping reviews still need to be conducted with rigour and transparency. Conclusion: This study provides guidance and advice for researchers and clinicians who are preparing to undertake an evidence synthesis and are considering a scoping review methodology in the field of nursing and midwifery. Impact: With the increasing popularity of scoping reviews, criticism of the rigour, transparency, and appropriateness of the methodology have been raised across multiple academic and clinical disciplines, including nursing and midwifery. This discussion paper provides a unique contribution by discussing each component of a scoping review, including: developing research questions and objectives; protocol development; developing eligibility criteria and the planned search approach; searching and selecting the evidence; extracting and analysing evidence; presenting results; and summarizing the evidence specifically for the fields of nursing and midwifery. Considerations for when to select this methodology and how to prepare a review for publication are also discussed. This approach is applied to the disciplines of nursing and midwifery to assist nursing and/or midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.
Keywords: evidence synthesis; methodology; midwifery; nursing; PRISMA-ScR; reporting; scoping review
Rights: © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
DOI: 10.1111/jan.14743
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Nursing publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_130572.pdfPublished version549.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.