Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/137187
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Modulation of I-Wave Generating Pathways With Repetitive Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - Electroencephalography Study
Author: Sasaki, R.
Hand, B.J.
Semmler, J.G.
Opie, G.M.
Citation: Neuromodulation, 2023; 26(4):755-766
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Issue Date: 2023
ISSN: 1094-7159
1525-1403
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Ryoki Sasaki, Brodie J. Hand, John G. Semmler, George M. Opie
Abstract: Objectives: Repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) at indirect (I) wave intervals increases motorevoked potentials (MEPs) produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to primary motor cortex (M1). However, the effects of iTMS at early and late intervals on the plasticity of specific I-wave circuits remain unclear. This study therefore aimed to assess how the timing of iTMS influences intracortical excitability within early and late I-wave circuits. To investigate the cortical effects of iTMS more directly, changes due to the intervention were also assessed using combined TMSelectroencephalography (EEG). Material and Methods: Eighteen young adults (aged 24.6 ± 4.2 years) participated in four sessions in which iTMS targeting early (1.5-millisecond interval; iTMS1.5) or late (4.0-millisecond interval; iTMS4.0) I-waves was applied over M1. Neuroplasticity was assessed using both posterior-to-anterior (PA) and anterior-to-posterior (AP) stimulus directions to record MEPs and TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs) before and after iTMS. Short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) at interstimulus intervals of 1.5 and 4.0 milliseconds was also used to index I-wave activity. Results: MEP amplitude was increased after iTMS (p < 0.01), and this was greater for PA responses (p < 0.01) but not different between iTMS intervals (p = 0.9). Irrespective of iTMS interval and coil current, SICF was facilitated after the intervention (p < 0.01). Although the N45 produced by AP stimulation was decreased by iTMS1.5 (p = 0.04), no other changes in TEP amplitude were observed. Conclusions: The timing of iTMS failed to influence which I-wave circuits were potentiated by the intervention. In contrast, decreases in the N45 suggest that the neuroplastic effects of iTMS may include disinhibition of intracortical inhibitory processes.
Keywords: I-wave periodicity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; motor-evoked potential; primary motor cortex; transcranial magnetic stimulation–electroencephalography; transcranial magnetic stimulation–evoked potential
Description: Published June 2023
Rights: © 2022 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.10.055
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1139723
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP200101009
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2022.10.055
Appears in Collections:Medical Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.