Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/138037
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Primary and Secondary Care Related Quality Indicators for Dementia Care Among Australian Aged Care Users: National Trends, Risk Factors, and Variation
Author: Rahja, M.
Air, T.
Ahern, S.
Ward, S.A.
Caughey, G.E.
Sluggett, J.K.
Cations, M.
Lin, X.
Wallis, K.
Crotty, M.
Inacio, M.C.
Citation: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 2022; 88(4):1511-1522
Publisher: IOS Press
Issue Date: 2022
ISSN: 1387-2877
1875-8908
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Miia Rahja, Tracy Air, Susannah Ahern, Stephanie A. Ward, Gillian E. Caughey, Janet K. Sluggett, Monica Cations, Xiaoping Lin, Kasey Wallis, Maria Crotty and Maria C. Inacio
Abstract: Background: Studies related to clinical quality indicators (CQIs) in dementia have focused on hospitalizations, medication management, and safety. Less attention has been paid to indicators related to primary and secondary care. Objective: To evaluate the incidence of primary and secondary care CQIs for Australians with dementia using governmentsubsidized aged care. The examined CQIs were: comprehensive medication reviews, 75+ health assessments, comprehensive geriatric assessments, chronic disease management plans, general practitioner (GP) mental health treatment plans, and psychiatrist attendances. Methods: Retrospective cohort study (2011–2016) of 255,458 individuals. National trend analyses estimated incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Poisson or negative binomial regression. Associations were assessed using backward stepwise multivariate Poisson or negative binomial regression model, as appropriate. Funnel plots examined geographic and permanent residential aged care (PRAC) facility variation. Results: CQI incidence increased in all CQIs but medication reviews. For the overall cohort, 75+ health assessments increased from 1.07/1000 person-days to 1.16/1000 person-days (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) = 1.03, 95%CI 1.02–1.03). Comprehensive geriatric assessments increased from 0.24 to 0.37/1000 person-days (aIRR = 1.12, 95%CI 1.10–1.14). GP mental health treatment plans increased from 0.04 to 0.07/1000 person-days (aIRR = 1.13, 95%CI 1.12–1.15). Psychiatric attendances increased from 0.09 to 0.11/1000 person-days (aIRR = 1.05, 95%CI 1.03–1.07). Being female, older, having fewer comorbidities, and living outside a major city were associated with lower likelihood of using the services. Large geographical and PRAC facility variation was observed (0–92%). Conclusion: Better use of primary and secondary care services to address needs of individuals with dementia is urgently needed.
Keywords: Dementia; health care; health services for the aged; primary health care; quality indicators; secondary care
Rights: © 2022 – IOS Press. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-220336
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/GNT1152623
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/GNT119378
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/GNT1156439
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/jad-220336
Appears in Collections:Pharmacology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.