Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/140948
Type: Thesis
Title: Equivalence of Telehealth and Face-To-Face Administration of the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV)
Author: Batholomaeus, Vanessa
Issue Date: 2022
School/Discipline: School of Psychology
Abstract: "Telehealth administration of cognitive tests like the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) have the potential to significantly increase access to important assessments for individuals in remote locations or where psychological services are limited. However, there is limited empirical evidence for the equivalence of telehealth and face-to-face administration. At present test publishers recommend not administering subtests with stimulus materials that need to be manipulated via telehealth. Therefore, the present study evaluated the equivalence of a telehealth administration procedure of the WAIS-IV with face-to-face administration. This randomised repeated measures design included a sample of N = 28 participants with typical cognitive functioning. The Two One Sided T-Tests (TOST) procedure was used to examine statistical equivalence between administration modes. Results showed that while mean differences were smaller than the standard error of measurement, the TOST procedure indicated that the Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) and the majority of subtests were no statistically equivalent across administration modes. Overall, these findings show that this telehealth mode of administration is a viable and pragmatic option for remote cognitive testing. However, psychologists are advised to use clinical judgement and be mindful of the benefits and limitations when interpreting scores obtained from telehealth administration. Keywords: telehealth, online testing, test administration, Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV"
Dissertation Note: Thesis (Master of Psychology (Clinical)) -- University of Adelaide, School of Psychology, 2022
Keywords: Masters; Psychology; Clinical
Description: This item is only available electronically.
Provenance: This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the author of this thesis and do not wish it to be made publicly available, or you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals
Appears in Collections:School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
BartholomaeusV_2022_Masters.pdf1.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.