Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/16850
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPomfret, R.-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationThe Economic Record, 2005; 81(253):166-176-
dc.identifier.issn0013-0249-
dc.identifier.issn1475-4932-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/16850-
dc.descriptionThe definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com-
dc.description.abstractThe dominant theoretical framework for analysing currency domains, optimum currency area (OCA) theory, has a miserable record in explaining actual currency area formation, expansion or dissolution. Ministates use foreign currencies to avoid high transactions costs; otherwise countries want control over their monetary policy. Nations do not tolerate multiple currencies, because they complicate public revenue and expenditure decisions. These arguments regarding control of monetary policy and content of fiscal policy differ from the OCA theory's emphasis on a trade-off between the microeconomic transactions costs benefits of a wider currency area and the macroeconomic policy benefits of a narrower currency area.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityRichard Pomfret-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Asia-
dc.source.urihttp://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2005.00241.x-
dc.titleCurrency areas in theory and practice-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1475-4932.2005.00241.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidPomfret, R. [0000-0002-1950-5856]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Economics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.