Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/17291
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Topically applied anaesthetics for treating perineal pain after childbirth
Author: Hedayati, H.
Parsons, J.
Crowther, C.
Citation: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2005; Online(2):WWW1-WWW21
Publisher: Update Software Ltd
Issue Date: 2005
ISSN: 1469-493X
1469-493X
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Hedayati H, Parsons J, Crowther CA
Abstract: <h4>Background</h4>Perineal trauma is a major problem affecting millions of women around the world each year. The degree of perineal pain and discomfort associated with perineal trauma is often underestimated. Pain often interferes with basic daily activities for the woman such as walking, sitting and passing urine and also negatively impacts on motherhood experiences.<h4>Objectives</h4>To assess the effects of topically applied anaesthetics for relief of perineal pain following childbirth whilst in hospital and following discharge.<h4>Search strategy</h4>We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (February 2004), CINAHL (1982 to December 2002) and MIDIRS (last searched February 2003). We checked reference lists of trials and review articles.<h4>Selection criteria</h4>Randomised controlled trials comparing topically applied anaesthetic with no treatment, placebo or alternative treatment.<h4>Data collection and analysis</h4>Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility and quality and double-entered the data. We contacted study authors for additional information.<h4>Main results</h4>Eight trials made up of 976 women were included in the review. Five of these trials measured pain experienced up to 24 hours after birth but different methods to assess pain were used in each of the studies. All five trials showed no difference in pain relief when the topical anaesthetic was compared with placebo. One of these studies looked at topical anaesthetics compared with indomethacin vaginal suppositories but there was no significant difference in mean pain scores. All trials reported only short-term follow up (up to four days). Two trials looked at additional analgesia taken for perineal pain, with one trial finding that less additional analgesia was required with epifoam use in comparison with placebo (relative risk (RR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 0.84, one trial, 97 women). However, lignocaine/lidocaine showed no difference with regard to additional analgesia use. Adverse effects were not formally measured in the studies; however, some studies commented that there were no side-effects severe enough to discontinue treatment. One study found that the women in the treatment group were more satisfied than the placebo group (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.65, one trial, 103 women).<h4>Authors' conclusions</h4>Evidence for the effectiveness of topically applied local anaesthetics for treating perineal pain is not compelling. There has been no evaluation for the long-term effects of topically applied local anaesthetics.
Keywords: Perineum
Humans
Pain
Anesthetics, Local
Episiotomy
Pregnancy
Parturition
Female
Obstetric Labor Complications
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004223
Published version: http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab004223.html
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.