Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/17428
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Is psychiatry an art or a science? The views of psychiatrists and trainees |
Author: | Chur-Hansen, A. Parker, D. |
Citation: | Australasian Psychiatry, 2005; 13(4):415-418 |
Publisher: | Informa Healthcare-Taylor & Francis |
Issue Date: | 2005 |
ISSN: | 1039-8562 1440-1665 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Anna Chur-Hansen and Damon Parker |
Abstract: | Objective: It is generally considered by many practitioners that psychiatry is an art, that is, one of the humanities, as well as being a science. We systematically collected the views of practitioners and trainee psychiatrists regarding the question ‘Is psychiatry an art or a science?’ Method: Eleven supervisors and nine trainees were interviewed and their responses analysed, using a qualitative method, the modified framework approach. Results: Several themes emerged from the data: that ‘art’ and ‘science’ are different; psychiatry as a discipline is difficult to define; psychiatry demands a broader range of skills than other medical specialties; the relationship of psychology to psychiatry; supervisor cynicism to the ‘science’ of psychiatry; and the ‘art’ and ‘science’ of the assessment process. Conclusions: The tension that exists within the profession's identity as a discipline has important implications for teaching, learning, and clinical and research practices. |
Keywords: | Science Psychiatry Art |
Description: | The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1440-1665.2005.02221.x |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1665.2005.02221.x |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 6 Psychiatry publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.