Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/17428
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Is psychiatry an art or a science? The views of psychiatrists and trainees
Author: Chur-Hansen, A.
Parker, D.
Citation: Australasian Psychiatry, 2005; 13(4):415-418
Publisher: Informa Healthcare-Taylor & Francis
Issue Date: 2005
ISSN: 1039-8562
1440-1665
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Anna Chur-Hansen and Damon Parker
Abstract: Objective: It is generally considered by many practitioners that psychiatry is an art, that is, one of the humanities, as well as being a science. We systematically collected the views of practitioners and trainee psychiatrists regarding the question ‘Is psychiatry an art or a science?’ Method: Eleven supervisors and nine trainees were interviewed and their responses analysed, using a qualitative method, the modified framework approach. Results: Several themes emerged from the data: that ‘art’ and ‘science’ are different; psychiatry as a discipline is difficult to define; psychiatry demands a broader range of skills than other medical specialties; the relationship of psychology to psychiatry; supervisor cynicism to the ‘science’ of psychiatry; and the ‘art’ and ‘science’ of the assessment process. Conclusions: The tension that exists within the profession's identity as a discipline has important implications for teaching, learning, and clinical and research practices.
Keywords: Science
Psychiatry
Art
Description: The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1665.2005.02221.x
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1665.2005.02221.x
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
Psychiatry publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.