Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Plagiarism detection and prevention. Pedagogical implications for lecturers of first year university students|
|Citation:||Enhancing the transition to higher education : strategies and policies that work, proceedings of the Seventh Pacific Rim Conference [on] First Year in Higher Education, 9-11 July 2003, QUT, Brisbane, Australia / Duncan Nulty & Noel Meyers (eds.)|
|Publisher:||Queensland University of Technology|
|Conference Name:||Pacific Rim Conference [on] First year in Higher Education (7th : 2003 : Brisbane, Australia)|
|Abstract:||Plagiarism detection and prevention is becoming an urgent issue in tertiary education, at a time when the internet provides students with access to an ever increasing variety of sources to incorporate into their assignments. As universities explore the use of electronic plagiarism detection systems, there is a need to consider the implications of a possible blowout in successful detection. The most obvious implication is to review the effectiveness of existing policies that are aimed at prevention. Taking into account the confusion with which many first year students view the concept of plagiarism, it is unlikely that more forceful reminders of the punitive powers of the policies will be sufficiently effective. It is suggested that a mainstream learning and teaching focus, not only on referencing conventions, but also on discipline-specific language development, may be needed in order to reduce the incidence of unintentional plagiarism by confused first year students.|
|Appears in Collections:||Centre for Learning and Professional Development publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.