Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/33591
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | O'Brien, G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Opie, J. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2001; 24(4):695-696 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0140-525X | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-1825 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/33591 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Kubovy and Epstein distinguish between systems that follow rules, and those that merely instantiate them. They regard compliance with the principles of kinematic geometry in apparent motion as a case of instantiation. There is, however, some reason to believe that the human visual system internalizes the principles of kinematic geometry, even if it does not explicitly represent them. We offer functional resemblance as a criterion for internal representation. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Gerard O'Brien and Jon Opie | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Cambridge Univ Press | - |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2001 Cambridge University Press | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01560082 | - |
dc.title | Functional resemblance and the internalization of rules | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.provenance | Published online by Cambridge University Press 20 Aug 2002 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S0140525X01560082 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Opie, J. [0000-0001-6593-4750] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 6 Philosophy publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
O'Brien_33591.pdf | Published version | 74.49 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.