Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCanil, J.en
dc.contributor.authorRosser, B.en
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of EFMA 2006 Annual Conference, 2006 / Pellon, J. (ed./s), pp.www1-www24en
dc.description.abstractThis paper addresses the question of how target manager entrenchment impacts on bidders’ initial takeover strategy, which comprises the toehold and the initial bid premium decisions, modeled as conjoint. We document several empirical regularities. The first is that the toehold alone has no explanatory power in explaining bidders’ takeover strategy. The second finding is that a cost savings construct internalizing the toehold and premium choices satisfactorily identifies the drivers of initial takeover strategies. Since our measure of cost savings is a direct measure of free rider cost savings, our conclusion is that free rider costs drive toehold and initial bid premium choices. Third, we show empirically that toeholder cost savings are increasing in the target management block after controlling for likely determinants of the toehold/principal outsider decision. Hence, free rider cost savings are higher for owner mangers than entrenched managers.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJean M. Canil and Bruce A. Rosseren
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of 15th Annual Meeting of the European Financial Management Associationen
dc.subjecttakeovers, toehold, entrenchment, strategyen
dc.titlePre-bid acquisitions of target stock and management-controlled equityen
dc.typeConference paperen
dc.contributor.conferenceEFMA Annual Conference (28 Jun 2006 : Madrid)en
pubs.library.collectionBusiness School publicationsen
dc.identifier.orcidCanil, J. [0000-0002-3646-4320]en
Appears in Collections:Business School publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.