Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Proceedings of EFMA 2006 Annual Conference, 2006 / Pellon, J.M. (ed./s), pp.www1-www24||en|
|dc.description.abstract||This paper addresses the question of how target manager entrenchment impacts on bidders’ initial takeover strategy, which comprises the toehold and the initial bid premium decisions, modeled as conjoint. We document several empirical regularities. The first is that the toehold alone has no explanatory power in explaining bidders’ takeover strategy. The second finding is that a cost savings construct internalizing the toehold and premium choices satisfactorily identifies the drivers of initial takeover strategies. Since our measure of cost savings is a direct measure of free rider cost savings, our conclusion is that free rider costs drive toehold and initial bid premium choices. Third, we show empirically that toeholder cost savings are increasing in the target management block after controlling for likely determinants of the toehold/principal outsider decision. Hence, free rider cost savings are higher for owner mangers than entrenched managers.||en|
|dc.description.statementofresponsibility||Jean M. Canil and Bruce A. Rosser||en|
|dc.relation.ispartof||Proceedings of 15th Annual Meeting of the European Financial Management Association||en|
|dc.subject||takeovers, toehold, entrenchment, strategy||en|
|dc.title||Pre-bid acquisitions of target stock and management-controlled equity||en|
|dc.contributor.conference||EFMA Annual Conference (28 Jun 2006 : Madrid)||en|
|pubs.library.collection||Business School publications||en|
|dc.identifier.orcid||Canil, J. [0000-0002-3646-4320]||en|
|Appears in Collections:||Business School publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.