Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/36442
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, T.-
dc.contributor.authorGudlaugsdottir, S.-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationCellular Oncology, 2002; 24(2):121-124-
dc.identifier.issn0884-6812-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/36442-
dc.description© Science Printers and Publishers-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To construct a statistical model for the agreements and disagreements between two observers on darkness of staining. Study Design: Data from an earlier observer-agreement study by van Diest et al were reanalyzed. Results: A model in which the random variation in error is permitted to depend upon the true darkness of staining was found to fit the data much better than does one in which the random variation is constant. Conclusion: For the dataset analyzed, error tends to be greater (that is, correlation between observers tends to be less) when staining is darker.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityT. Paul Hutchinson and Sigurbjorg Gudlaugsdottir-
dc.description.urihttp://www.aqch.com/toc/auto_abstract.php?id=16107-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSci Printers & Publ Inc-
dc.subjectBreast cancer-
dc.subjectstaining-
dc.subjectimmunohistochemistry-
dc.subjectreproducibility of results-
dc.subjectheteroscedasticity of errors-
dc.titleModelling errors in scoring the darkness of staining-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidHutchinson, T. [0000-0002-4429-0885]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Centre for Automotive Safety Research publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.