Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Australian Journal of Psychology, 2007; 59(1):43-50||-|
|dc.description.abstract||This study examines how parents attribute responsibility when their child commits an illicit act. Sixty-seven mothers and 26 fathers (N=93), with care and control of a child between 10 and 18 years, attributed responsibility to the parent and child in eight hypothetical scenarios in which a child commits an illicit offence. Findings indicate that greater responsibility is attributed to the child than the parent. More responsibility was attributed to older children than younger children, while the parents of older children bear significantly less responsibility than parents of younger children who offend. Furthermore, offences of high severity warrant significantly more responsibility than offences of low severity. There was no main effect of type of offence, but this variable did interact significantly with the age of the offender and the severity of the offence. Perceived responsibility for the offences was also related to locus of control. These findings suggest that parents do not uniformly accept responsibility for the illicit acts of their adolescent children. The implications for juvenile crime will be discussed. © The Australian Psychological Society Ltd Published by Taylor & Francis.||-|
|dc.description.statementofresponsibility||Nancy White; Martha Augoustinos; John Taplin||-|
|dc.publisher||Australian Psychological Soc||-|
|dc.title||Parental responsibility for the illicit acts of their children: Effects of age, type and severity of offence||-|
|dc.identifier.orcid||Augoustinos, M. [0000-0002-7212-1499]||-|
|Appears in Collections:||Aurora harvest|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.