Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Unconvincing and perplexing: Hutchinson and Stapleton on judging|
|Citation:||The University of Queensland Law Journal, 2007; 26(1):67-82|
|Publisher:||University of Queensland Press|
|Abstract:||The articles by Allan Hutchinson and Jane Stapleton which illustrate the emerging orthodoxy in Australian legal thought that judging is, essentially, politics in another form, are argued to be unconvincing. It is stated that Hutchinson's argument is confused and confusing, self-contradictory, and relies on a puzzling misreading of Charles Dickens' Bleak House while Stapleton's project is simply implausible and at odds with other work of hers which illustrates the problems with the instrumentalist role that she advocates for the Australian judiciary and the reason for scholars of international repute making such unconvincing arguments are considered.|
|Appears in Collections:||Law publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.