Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/43028
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bartie, S. | en |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | University of Western Australia Law Review, 2007; 33:415-436 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0042-0328 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/43028 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The function of judicial reasoning in negligence actions - guidance on the principles of remoteness and causality - reforms in Australian jurisdictions aimed at governing the approach that courts must take to these principles - aims of reforms - introduction of a two-stage approach: 'factual causation' and 'scope of liability' - critique of reforms - whether they will achieve their intended purpose - relevant case law. | en |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Susan Bartie | en |
dc.description.uri | http://search.informit.com.au/fullText;dn=20082825;res=AGISPT | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | University of Western Australia, Law School | en |
dc.title | Ambition versus judicial reality: Causation and remoteness under civil liability legislation | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
pubs.publication-status | Published | en |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Law publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.