Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/43028
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBartie, S.en
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.identifier.citationUniversity of Western Australia Law Review, 2007; 33:415-436en
dc.identifier.issn0042-0328en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/43028-
dc.description.abstractThe function of judicial reasoning in negligence actions - guidance on the principles of remoteness and causality - reforms in Australian jurisdictions aimed at governing the approach that courts must take to these principles - aims of reforms - introduction of a two-stage approach: 'factual causation' and 'scope of liability' - critique of reforms - whether they will achieve their intended purpose - relevant case law.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilitySusan Bartieen
dc.description.urihttp://search.informit.com.au/fullText;dn=20082825;res=AGISPTen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Western Australia, Law Schoolen
dc.titleAmbition versus judicial reality: Causation and remoteness under civil liability legislationen
dc.typeJournal articleen
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.