Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Antipodeans differ over advocates' immunity.|
|Citation:||Insurance Law Journal, 2007; 18(1):98-102|
|Abstract:||In Chamberlains v Lai, the NZ Supreme Court held that advocates' immunity no longer constituted a part of NZ common law - contrasts with the High Court of Australia's decision in D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid, where immunity was retained|
|Appears in Collections:||Law publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.