Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/47113
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, G.-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Journal of Public Administration, 2008; 67(1):30-40-
dc.identifier.issn0313-6647-
dc.identifier.issn1467-8500-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/47113-
dc.descriptionPublished in Australian Journal of Public Administration, 2008; 67 (1):30-40 at www.interscience.wiley.com Copyright © 2008 The Author-
dc.description.abstract<jats:p> <jats:italic>The article focuses on the relationship between the executive and the judiciary in respect of a legal case that provoked public outrage. This outrage entered into the media spectacle and was channelled by the executive into calling a royal commission. The royal commission was charged with re‐examining the police actions and the legal case. However, hidden behind its narrow terms of reference was the larger question of justice being ‘blind’ to a network of privilege. As such, the royal commission had the potential to threaten the independence of the judiciary.</jats:italic> </jats:p>-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGreg McCarthy-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publ Ltd-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00574.x-
dc.titlePublic outrage, media spectacle and the Kapunda Road Royal Commission-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00574-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
Politics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.