Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Axonal Injury in falls|
|Citation:||Journal of Neurotrauma, 1997; 14(10):699-713|
|Publisher:||Mary Ann Liebert Inc Publications|
|Organisation:||Centre for Automotive Safety Research (CASR)|
|Amal Abou-Hamden, Peter C. Blumbergs, Grace Scott, Jim Manavis, Helen Wainright, Nigel Jones and Jack Mclean|
|Abstract:||Amyloid precursor protein (APP) immunocytochernistry was used as a marker for axonal injury (AI) in a series of 16 cases of head trauma associated with fatal falls. Nine cases were falls from not more than the person's own height (falls from 5 own height) and seven cases were falls from a distance greater than the person's own height (falls from > own height). A1 was recorded on a series of line diagrams of standard brain sections divided into 116 sectors. A1 around focal lesions (infarcts, hemorrhages, contusions) was distinguished from nonfocal axonal injury that was distant from any focal area of damage. The percentage of sectors showing focal A1 provided the Focal Axonal Injury Score (FAIS) and the percentage showing nonfocal A1 the Non-Focal Axonal Injury Score (NFAIS). The FAIS is a measure of secondary AI and the NFAIS of diffuse axonal injury (DAI). The percentage of sectors involved with A1 (focal and nonfocal) provided the cumulative Axonal Injury Score (AIS). A semiquantitative grading system was also used to assess the severity of axonal injury in each sector and the sum of the grades from all sectors was expressed as a percentage to provide the Axonal Injury Severity Score (AISS). Widespread A1 was present in all cases irrespective of the height of the fall. AI was present in the midbrain (94%), pons (94%), corpus callosurn (100%), central grey matter (100%), and cerebral hemispheric white matter (94%). AIS ranged from 10 to 94 in falls from 5 own height (mean 73) and from 38 to 92 in falls from > own height (mean 82). AISS ranged from 6 to 95 in falls from 5 own height (mean 65) and 28 to 95 in falls from > own height (mean 72). There was no statistically significant difference in AIS or AISS between the two groups. The extent and severity of A1 cannot be predicted from biomechanical data, such as the height of the fall, as the total A I in a given case is a variable mixture of Nunfocal A1 (DAI) and Focal A1 arising by secondary mechanisms, and APP immunostaining is unable to distinguish primary from secondary AL However, the combination of the Hypoxic-Ischemic Score (HIS) defined as the percentage of sectors showing any hypoxic-ischemic damage ranging from neuronal "red cell change" to infarction in conjunction with the FAIS and NFAIS provided a measure of the relative contribution of primary and secondary AI in a given brain.|
|Keywords:||falls; human head injury; axonal injury; amyloid precursor protein; axonal injury score; hy-poxia-ischemia|
|Appears in Collections:||Centre for Automotive Safety Research publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.