Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/5317
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArtaria, M.en
dc.contributor.authorHenneberg, M.en
dc.date.issued2000en
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Human Biology, 2000; 27(6):561-569en
dc.identifier.issn0301-4460en
dc.identifier.issn1464-5033en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/5317-
dc.description.abstractPRIMARY OBJECTIVE:To show that socio-economically dependent cultural bias distorts results of the status quo method of estimating age at first menstruation. METHODS:Questionnaires asking for menstrual status and the recalled age at menarche were distributed to approximately 1000 Javanese girls who attended junior and senior high schools in Malang. Age of participants ranged from 11.98 to 18.89 years. Probit analysis was applied to the status quo data while average menarcheal age recalled by girls > or =16 year old was also calculated. t-test, F-test, ANOVA and chi2 tests were applied to test significance of differences between groups. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS:Girls of low occupational status fathers (Group 1) had a probit average menarcheal age of 13.99 years (SD = 1.33, n = 524). Girls of medium occupational status fathers (Group 2), had a lower probit average menarcheal age (13.06 SD = 1.38, n = 315). Girls of fathers with the highest occupational score (Group 3) rarely reported premenarcheal status (less than 10% in all age groups studied) and the probit analysis of their reports yielded an unbelievable average of 9.61 (SD = 3.41, n = 157) years. Group 3 girls tend to report their menarcheal status incorrectly, probably due to a 'fashion' of appearing mature or to 'contagion' during filling out of a questionnaire. The recalled average menarcheal age of Group 3 females questioned when they were aged 16 years and above, yields an average that seems to be more reliable (12.74 years, SD = 1.41, n = 7), because at a fully postmenarcheal age there is no need to enhance one's status by falsely claiming maturity.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden
dc.subjectHumans; Analysis of Variance; Deception; Age Factors; Menarche; Cultural Characteristics; Socioeconomic Factors; Adolescent; Adult; Child; Indonesia; Female; Surveys and Questionnairesen
dc.titleWhy did they lie? Socio-economic bias in reporting menarcheal ageen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0001000196en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03014460050178669en
dc.identifier.pubid63886-
pubs.library.collectionAnatomical Sciences publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidHenneberg, M. [0000-0003-1941-2286]en
Appears in Collections:Anatomical Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.