Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/54099
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Variation in segmentation of bone from micro-CT imaging: implications for quantitative morphometric analysis
Author: Parkinson, I.
Badiei, A.
Fazzalari, N.
Citation: Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2008; 31(2):160-164
Publisher: Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine
Issue Date: 2008
ISSN: 0158-9938
1879-5447
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Parkinson, IH; Badiei, A and Fazzalari, NL
Abstract: Segmentation of bone in grey-level tomographs from micro-CT imaging is critical in determining the accuracy of morphometric analysis. The degree of variability in image segmentation between and within multiple operators will be quantified and compared with automated image segmentation. Three cubes of cancellous bone were cut from T12, L1, L3 and L4 human vertebral bodies (n=12). Micro-CT imaging was performed and a global threshold was determined by 3 operators independently and automatically using Otsu's algorithm. Bone volume, trabecular thickness, trabecular separation, trabecular number, trabecular bone pattern factor, structure model index and degree of anisotropy were calculated. Percent bias and percent random error were calculated between all operators and Otsu's method. For BV/TV, the maximum percent bias and percent random error were 22.0% and 11.3%, respectively, which constitutes differences in individual measurements between operators of up to 0.07. For Tb.Th, the maximum percent bias and percent random error were 13.1% and 6.4%, respectively, which constitutes differences in individual measurements between operators of up to 35 m. These data highlight to users of micro-CT imaging that morphometric analysis is highly sensitive to operating parameters. The effect on measurements of cancellous bone structure of different operators can be greater than experimental differences, which can lead to erroneous interpretation of results.
Keywords: Thoracic Vertebrae
Humans
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Radiographic Image Enhancement
Sensitivity and Specificity
Reproducibility of Results
Adult
Female
DOI: 10.1007/BF03178592
Description (link): http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=172851795385352;res=IELHEA
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03178592
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Pathology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.