Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Body position affects performance in untrained cyclists|
|Author:||Ashe, M. C.|
Scroop, Garry Campbell
Frisken, P. I.
Amery, C. A.
Wilkins, M. A.
Khan, K. M.
|Citation:||British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2003; 37(5):441-444|
|Publisher:||British Med Journal Publ Group|
|School/Discipline:||School of Medical Sciences : Pharmacology|
|M C Ashe, G C Scroop, P I Frisken, C A Amery, M A Wilkins, K M Khan|
|Abstract:||Objective: To compare cardiovascular and ventilatory variables in upright versus aero cycle ergometry at submaximal and maximal exercise intensities in untrained cyclists. Method: Ten physically active men (mean (SD) age 19.1 (1.10) years) who were unfamiliar with aerobars underwent maximal exercise testing and steady state cycling at 50, 100, and 150 W. Results: Participants had significantly greater maxima for oxygen uptake (Vo2), ventilation, heart rate, and workload maximum in the upright position. During steady state cycling at the three workloads, Vo2 (ml/kg/min) and gross mechanical efficiency were significantly greater in the upright position. Conclusions: In untrained subjects performing with maximal effort, the upright position permits greater Vo2, ventilation, heart rate, and workload maxima. Further, in the steady state, exercise cycling may be less costly in the upright position. For this reason, untrained cyclists need to weigh body position effects against the well known aerodynamic advantages of the aero position.|
|Appears in Collections:||Pharmacology publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.