Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/56460
Type: Journal article
Title: Comparison of high and low achievers: a discussion of Juter's (2007) article
Author: Hutchinson, T.
Citation: The Montana Math Enthusiast, 2009; 6(1&2):207-212
Publisher: Montana Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Issue Date: 2009
ISSN: 1551-3440
Statement of
Responsibility: 
T. P. Hutchinson
Abstract: The use of questionnaires and interviews to compare the responses to a mathematical task of high achievers with low achievers has limitations. The partial information that they have provides a way of comparing high and low achievers. Some references are given here to relevant task formats and theories. An example is given of how examinees’ performance with unusual task formats (specifically, answer-until-correct) may be analysed to throw light on the mathematical description of partial information.
Keywords: answer until correct tasks; research methodology; questionnaire analysis; task formats
RMID: 0020093974
Published version: http://www.math.umt.edu/TMME/vol6no1and2/
Appears in Collections:Centre for Automotive Safety Research publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.