Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/62351
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of ScienceĀ® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Canil, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rosser, B. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 2010; 6(1):6-18 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1810-8601 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2312-2722 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/62351 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <jats:p>This study tests the Hall and Murphy (2000, 2002) propositions using a dataset wherein in-the money and out-of-the-money option grants are just as prevalent as at-the-money option grants. The choice of grant size and exercise price in determining optimal pay-performance sensitivity, reveals an over prescription of at-the-money options at the expense of in-the-money options, particularly for high risk-averse CEOs. Also, pay-performance sensitivity is found unexpectedly negatively related to the exercise price, which is attributed to an equally unexpected inverse relation between risk aversion and grant size.</jats:p> | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Jean M. Canil and Bruce A. Rosser | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Virtus Interpress | - |
dc.rights | Copyright 2010 Virtus Interpress. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cbv6i1art1 | - |
dc.title | Is there an optimum grant size and exercise price for incentivizing executives? | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.22495/cbv6i1art1 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Canil, J. [0000-0002-3646-4320] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Business School publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.