Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||The classical trinity and Kant's Aesthetic formalism|
|Citation:||Critical Horizons, 2010; 11(3):419-441|
|Publisher:||Equinox Publishing Ltd|
|Abstract:||I identify two mutually exclusive notions of formalism in Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgement: a thin concept of aesthetic formalism and a thick concept of aesthetic formalism. Arguably there is textual support for both concepts in Kant’s third critique. I offer interpretations of three key elements in the Critique of Aesthetic Judgement which support a thick formalism. The three key elements are: Harmony of the Faculties, Aesthetic Ideas and Sensus Communis. I interpret these concepts in relation to the conditions for theoretical Reason, the conditions for moral motivation and the conditions for intersubjectivity, respectively. I conclude that there is no support for a thin concept of aesthetic formalism when the key elements of Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgement are understood in the context of his broader critical aims.|
|Keywords:||Kant’s aesthetic formalism; Harmony of the Faculties; Aesthetic Ideas; Sensus Communis; moral motivation; intersubjectivity|
|Rights:||© Equinox Publishing Ltd 2011|
|Appears in Collections:||Philosophy publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.