Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/63022
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: The classical trinity and Kant's Aesthetic formalism
Author: McMahon, J.
Citation: Critical Horizons, 2010; 11(3):419-441
Publisher: Equinox Publishing Ltd
Issue Date: 2010
ISSN: 1440-9917
1568-5160
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Jenny McMahon
Abstract: I identify two mutually exclusive notions of formalism in Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgement: a thin concept of aesthetic formalism and a thick concept of aesthetic formalism. Arguably there is textual support for both concepts in Kant’s third critique. I offer interpretations of three key elements in the Critique of Aesthetic Judgement which support a thick formalism. The three key elements are: Harmony of the Faculties, Aesthetic Ideas and Sensus Communis. I interpret these concepts in relation to the conditions for theoretical Reason, the conditions for moral motivation and the conditions for intersubjectivity, respectively. I conclude that there is no support for a thin concept of aesthetic formalism when the key elements of Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgement are understood in the context of his broader critical aims.
Keywords: Kant’s aesthetic formalism; Harmony of the Faculties; Aesthetic Ideas; Sensus Communis; moral motivation; intersubjectivity
Rights: © Equinox Publishing Ltd 2011
RMID: 0020103935
DOI: 10.1558/crit.v11i3.419
Appears in Collections:Philosophy publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.