Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHill, L.en
dc.contributor.authorKoch, C.en
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Journal of Political Science, 2011; 46(2):213-228en
dc.description.abstractDrawing on and combining political science and legal frameworks, this article explores the validity of disenfranchising Australian prisoners. The authors examine and critically assess the various arguments used in Australia by both legislators and High Court Justices to defend the practice of disenfranchisement. Such arguments are assessed against liberal democratic principles as well as jurisprudence arising from cases in settings that provide protection for electoral rights in formal charters of rights. The authors show that in settings that entrench voting rights in the Constitution, any infringement attracts strict scrutiny from the courts. Courts insist that any abridgement of voting rights should serve a legitimate government purpose and be proportionate to that purpose. The arguments made for prisoner disenfranchisement by legislators in the Australian context invariably fail both parts of this test.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityLisa Hill and Cornelia Kochen
dc.publisherCarfax Publishingen
dc.rights© 2011 Australian Political Studies Associationen
dc.titleThe voting rights of incarcerated Australian citizensen
dc.typeJournal articleen
pubs.library.collectionPolitics publicationsen
dc.identifier.orcidHill, L. [0000-0002-9098-7800]en
Appears in Collections:Politics publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_72158.pdfRestricted Access169.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.