Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/73919
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, D.-
dc.contributor.authorThiele, P.-
dc.contributor.authorWatkins, A.-
dc.contributor.authorde Crespigny, L.-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationBJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2012; 119(11):1302-1307-
dc.identifier.issn1470-0328-
dc.identifier.issn1471-0528-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/73919-
dc.description.abstractPrenatally diagnosed abnormalities that are associated with death in the newborn period are often referred to as ‘lethal malformations’. Yet, for many of the commonly described lethal malformations long-term survival is possible if supportive interventions are provided. In this paper we analyse and review fetal or congenital lethal abnormalities. The designation ‘lethal’ overlaps with the concept of ‘medical futility’. The term is used for a heterogenous group of conditions, and hinders clear communication and counselling. We argue that the term should be avoided, and propose in its place a set of key questions that should be addressed by counselling.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDJC Wilkinson, P Thiele, A Watkins, L De Crespigny-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd-
dc.rights© 2012 The Authors-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03450.x-
dc.subjectEthics-
dc.subjectfatal outcome-
dc.subjectprenatal diagnosis-
dc.titleFatally flawed? A review and ethical analysis of lethal congenital malformations-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03450.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.