Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/77119
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Conference paper
Title: Overpressures in the Northern Malay Basin: Part 1 - Origin and Distribution
Author: Tingay, M.
Morley, C.
Laird, A.
Limpornpipat, O.
Krisadasima, K.
Pabchanda, S.
Macintyre, H.
Citation: Society of Petroleum Engineers - International Petroleum Technology Conference 2012 : IPTC 2012: pp.3278-3289
Publisher: SPE
Publisher Place: CDROM
Issue Date: 2012
ISBN: 9781618396594
Conference Name: International Petroleum Technology Conference (2012 : Bangkok, Thailand)
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Mark Tingay, Chris Morley, Andrew Laird, Orapan Limpornpipat, Kanjana Krisadasima, and Suwit Pabchanda, Hamish Macintyre
Abstract: Pore pressure data and sonic velocity-vertical effective stress plots from 31 wells reveal that overpressures in the northern Malay Basin are primarily generated by fluid expansion and located basin-wide within the 2A, 2B and 2C source rock formations. Overpressure magnitude increases towards the basin-centre, with maximum pore pressure gradients of >19.0 MPa/km observed in the southeast of the study area. The overpressures are predominately associated with gas, with gas sampled in over 83% of overpressure measurements. The association of overpressures with gas, combined with a regional geology that largely precludes other fluid expansion overpressure mechanisms, provides the first convincing in-situ evidence for basin-wide gas generation overpressure. Overpressure magnitude analysis suggests that gas generation accounts for approximately 70-50% of the measured excess pore pressure in the region, with the remaining 30-50% being generated by coincident disequilibrium compaction. Thus, the data herein indicates that gas generation, if acting in isolation, produces a maximum pressure gradient of 15.2 MPa/km (0.672 psi/ft), and not lithostatic magnitudes as is often hypothesized. The gas generation overpressures in this study are not associated with a significant porosity anomaly and thus represent a major drilling hazard, with traditional pore pressure prediction techniques underestimating pressure gradients by 2.3±1.5 MPa/km (0.102±0.066 psi/ft). However, pore pressure prediction may be attempted using a calibrated empirical model after careful picking and smoothing of the velocity data.
Description: Document ID: 15345-MS
Rights: Copyright 2011. International Petroleum Technology Conference
DOI: 10.2523/15345-MS
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.2523/15345-ms
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Australian School of Petroleum publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.