Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/78894
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Perioperative anesthetic documentation: Adherence to current Australian guidelines
Author: Elhalawani, I.
Jenkins, S.
Newman, N.
Citation: Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharamacology, 2013; 29(2):211-215
Publisher: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt Ltd
Issue Date: 2013
ISSN: 0970-9185
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Islam Elhalawani, Simon Jenkins, Nicole Newman
Abstract: Purpose: The lack of adequate perioperative documentation has legal implications and can potentially affect the quality and safety of patient care. Despite the presence of guidelines, the adequacy of perioperative documentation in Australasia has not been adequately assessed. The aim of this study is to assess the adequacy of anesthetic documentation on the pre and intraoperative encounters and to test the hypotheses that documentation is incomplete in the settings of emergency vs. elective procedures, regional vs. general anesthesia, and manual vs. electronic documentation. Materials and Methods: The study was an observational retrospective study in the setting of a 250-bed teaching hospital in metropolitan Adelaide, Australia. The perioperative records of 850 patients were analyzed. A scoring system was designed, based on a policy statement from the Australian and New Zealand College of Anesthetists and a survey of the hospital anesthetists. Scored and categorical data was analyzed using Chi-square test. Numerical data was analyzed using student t-test. The null hypothesis was accepted or rejected at 0.05 significance. Results: There were significant deficiencies in the adequacy of preanesthetic and intraoperative records. This has been shown to be true in all cases. Documentation was found to be poorer in the emergency setting when compared to elective cases (median scores 15 vs. 21 P = 0.03) as well as documentation of airway assessment for cases done solely under regional anesthesia (42 vs. 85%, P = 0.05). There were no significant differences in the adequacy of electronic vs. manual records ( P = 0.92). Conclusion: There are significant deficiencies in the adequacy of perioperative records. This has been shown to be true in all cases, but is especially so in emergency cases and for patients having only regional anesthesia.
Keywords: Anesthesia; documentation; electronic; emergency; regional
Rights: Copyright the authors
RMID: 0020128839
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.111726
Appears in Collections:Anaesthesia and Intensive Care publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_78894.pdfPublished version712.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
hdl_78894_version.pdfVersion information11.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.