Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/79892
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWiederman, S.-
dc.contributor.authorShoemaker, P.-
dc.contributor.authorO'Carroll, D.-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Neuroscience, 2013; 33(32):13225-13232-
dc.identifier.issn0270-6474-
dc.identifier.issn1529-2401-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/79892-
dc.description.abstractIn both vertebrates and invertebrates, evidence supports separation of luminance increments and decrements (ON and OFF channels) in early stages of visual processing (Hartline, 1938; Joesch et al., 2010); however, less is known about how these parallel pathways are recombined to encode form and motion. In Drosophila, genetic knockdown of inputs to putative ON and OFF pathways and direct recording from downstream neurons in the wide-field motion pathway reveal that local elementary motion detectors exist in pairs that separately correlate contrast polarity channels, ON with ON and OFF with OFF (Joesch et al., 2013). However, behavioral responses to reverse-phi motion of discrete features reveal additional correlations of the opposite signs (Clark et al., 2011). We here present intracellular recordings from feature detecting neurons in the dragonfly that provide direct physiological evidence for the correlation of OFF and ON pathways. These neurons show clear polarity selectivity for feature contrast, responding strongly to targets that are darker than the background and only weakly to dark contrasting edges. These dark target responses are much stronger than the linear combination of responses to ON and OFF edges. We compare these data with output from elementary motion detector-based models (Eichner et al., 2011; Clark et al., 2011), with and without stages of strong center-surround antagonism. Our data support an alternative elementary small target motion detector model, which derives dark target selectivity from the correlation of a delayed OFF with an un-delayed ON signal at each individual visual processing unit (Wiederman et al., 2008, 2009).-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilitySteven D. Wiederman, Patrick A. Shoemaker and David C. O’Carroll-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSociety for Neuroscience-
dc.rights© 2013 the authors. Authors grant JNeurosci a license to publish their work and copyright remains with the author. Material published from 2010 to 2014 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-NC-SA).-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1277-13.2013-
dc.subjectVisual Pathways-
dc.subjectNeurons-
dc.subjectAnimals-
dc.subjectPhotic Stimulation-
dc.subjectMotion Perception-
dc.subjectAction Potentials-
dc.subjectVisual Fields-
dc.subjectDarkness-
dc.subjectModels, Neurological-
dc.subjectTime Factors-
dc.subjectFemale-
dc.subjectMale-
dc.subjectStatistics as Topic-
dc.subjectInsecta-
dc.titleCorrelation between OFF and ON channels underlies dark target selectivity in an insect visual system-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1277-13.2013-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP130104572-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidWiederman, S. [0000-0002-0902-803X]-
dc.identifier.orcidO'Carroll, D. [0000-0002-2352-4320]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Physiology publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_79892.pdfPublished version1.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.