Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/80526
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStern, C.en
dc.contributor.authorChur-Hansen, A.en
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citationAnimals, 2013; 3(1):127-141en
dc.identifier.issn2076-2615en
dc.identifier.issn2076-2615en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/80526-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a discussion of the literature on animal-assisted interventions and describes limitations surrounding current methodological quality. Benefits to human physical, psychological and social health cannot be empirically confirmed due to the methodological limitations of the existing body of research, and comparisons cannot validly be made across different studies. Without a solid research base animal-assisted interventions will not receive recognition and acceptance as a credible alternative health care treatment. The paper draws on the work of four systematic reviews conducted over April–May 2009, with no date restrictions, focusing exclusively on the use of canine-assisted interventions for older people residing in long-term care. The reviews revealed a lack of good quality studies. Although the literature base has grown in volume since its inception, it predominantly consists of anecdotal accounts and reports. Experimental studies undertaken are often flawed in aspects of design, conduct and reporting. There are few qualitative studies available leading to the inability to draw definitive conclusions. It is clear that due to the complexities associated with these interventions not all weaknesses can be eliminated. However, there are basic methodological weaknesses that can be addressed in future studies in the area. Checklists for quantitative and qualitative research designs to guide future research are offered to help address methodological rigour.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityCindy Stern and Anna Chur-Hansenen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPIAGen
dc.rights© 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).en
dc.subjectanimal-assisted interventions; evidence based practice; qualitative; quantitative; methodologyen
dc.titleMethodological considerations in designing and evaluating animal-assisted interventionsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020131719en
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ani3010127en
dc.identifier.pubid18080-
pubs.library.collectionPsychiatry publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidStern, C. [0000-0002-0924-5042]en
dc.identifier.orcidChur-Hansen, A. [0000-0002-2935-2689]en
Appears in Collections:Psychiatry publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_80526.pdfPublished version168.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.