Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/82059
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Comparisons between intragastric and small intestinal delivery of enteral nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author: Deane, A.
Rupinder, D.
Day, A.
Ridley, E.
Davies, A.
Heyland, D.
Citation: Critical Care, 2013; 17(3):1-12
Publisher: Current Science Ltd
Issue Date: 2013
ISSN: 1466-609X
Statement of
Responsibility: 
M Deane Adam, Dhaliwal Rupinder, G Day Andrew, J Ridley Emma, R Davies Andrew and K Heyland Daren
Abstract: Introduction The largest cohort of critically ill patients evaluating intragastric and small intestinal delivery of nutrients was recently reported. This systematic review included recent data to compare the effects of small bowel and intragastric delivery of enteral nutrients in adult critically ill patients. Methods This is a systematic review of all randomised controlled studies published between 1990 and March 2013 that reported the effects of the route of enteral feeding in the critically ill on clinically important outcomes. Results Data from 15 level-2 studies were included. Small bowel feeding was associated with a reduced risk of pneumonia (Relative Risk, RR, small intestinal vs. intragastric: 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.93); P = 0.01; I2 = 11%). The point estimate was similar when only studies using microbiological data were included. Duration of ventilation (weighted mean difference: -0.36 days (-2.02 to 1.30); P = 0.65; I2 = 42%), length of ICU stay (WMD: 0.49 days, (-1.36 to 2.33); P = 0.60; I2 = 81%) and mortality (RR 1.01 (0.83 to 1.24); P = 0.92; I2 = 0%) were unaffected by the route of feeding. While data were limited, and there was substantial statistical heterogeneity, there was significantly improved nutrient intake via the small intestinal route (% goal rate received: 11% (5 to 16%); P = 0.0004; I2 = 88%). Conclusions Use of small intestinal feeding may improve nutritional intake and reduce the incidence of ICU-acquired pneumonia. In unselected critically ill patients other clinically important outcomes were unaffected by the site of the feeding tube.
Rights: © 2013 Deane et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
RMID: 0020134617
DOI: 10.1186/cc12800
Published version: http://ccforum.com/content/17/3/R125
Appears in Collections:Anaesthesia and Intensive Care publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_82059.pdfPublished version311.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.