Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/85028
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Measuring outcomes in fertility trials: can we rely on clinical pregnancy rates?
Author: Clarke, J.
van Rumste, M.
Farquhar, C.
Johnson, N.
Mol, B.
Herbison, P.
Citation: Fertility and Sterility, 2010; 94(5):1647-1651
Publisher: Elsevier
Issue Date: 2010
ISSN: 0015-0282
1556-5653
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Jane F. Clarke, Minouche M. E. van Rumste, Cindy M. Farquhar, Neil P. Johnson, Ben W. J. Mol, and Peter Herbison
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the estimates of treatment effect in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in reproductive medicine differ when either clinical pregnancy or live birth is used as the outcome measure. DESIGN: Metaanalysis. SETTING: We analyzed RCTs in reproductive medicine found in systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Library that reported on both clinical pregnancy and live birth. PATIENT(S): Subfertile couples. INTERVENTION(S): For each individual RCT, data on clinical pregnancy and live birth were extracted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We compared the outcome of each study by calculating a kappa-statistic (statistically significant treatment effective or not) and by comparing the odds ratio by calculating the ratio of the odds ratios (ROR). RESULT(S): We found 67 systematic reviews, of which 42 reported on pregnancy and live birth. These 42 reviews included 654 RCTs, of which 143 (22%) reported both on pregnancy and live birth. The pregnancy loss rates in the treatment and control groups were comparable. Of the 143 RCTs, the conclusion based on pregnancy rate and live birth rate was comparable (kappa value of 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.94). The odds ratios estimating treatment effect from pregnancy and live birth were also comparable (ROR, 1.01, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.12). CONCLUSION(S): Only a minority of randomized clinical trials in reproductive medicine report on live birth. Conclusions on the effectiveness of a treatment based on either clinical pregnancy or live birth as endpoints are comparable.
Keywords: Surrogate outcome; clinical pregnancy; live birth; subfertility; infertiliy
Rights: © 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine
RMID: 0020136848
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.018
Appears in Collections:Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.