Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/86349
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, X.-
dc.contributor.authorHu, X.-
dc.contributor.authorKeller, M.-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, H.-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, T.-
dc.contributor.editorGlinwood, R.-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS One, 2014; 9(9):1-10-
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/86349-
dc.description.abstractThe tripartite interactions in a pathosystem involving wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), the Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV), and the BYDV vector aphid Sitobion avenae were studied under field conditions to determine the impact of these interactions on aphid populations, virus pathology and grain yield. Wheat varietal resistance to BYDV and aphids varied among the three wheat varieties studied over two consecutive years. The results demonstrated that (1) aphid peak number (APN) in the aphid + BYDV (viruliferous aphid) treatment was greater and occurred earlier than that in the non-viruliferous aphid treatment. The APN and the area under the curve of population dynamics (AUC) on a S. avenae-resistant variety 98-10-30 was significantly lower than on two aphid-susceptible varieties Tam200(13)G and Xiaoyan6. (2) The production of alatae (PA) was greater on the variety 98-10-30 than on the other varieties, and PA was greater in the aphid + BYDV treatment on 98-10-30 than in the non-viruliferous aphid treatment, but this trend was reversed on Tam200(13)G and Xiaoyan6. (3) The BYDV disease incidence (DIC) on the variety 98-10-30 was greater than that on the other two varieties in 2012, and the disease index (DID) on Tam200(13)G was lower than on the other varieties in the aphid + BYDV and BYDV treatments in 2012, but not in 2011 when aphid vector numbers were generally lower. (4) Yield loss in the aphid + BYDV treatment tended to be greater than that in the aphid or BYDV alone treatments across varieties and years. We suggested that aphid population development and BYDV transmission tend to promote each other under field conditions. The aphids + BYDV treatment caused greater yield reductions than non-viruliferous aphids or virus treatment. Wheat varietal resistance in 98-10-30 affects the aphid dispersal, virus transmission and wheat yield loss though inhibits aphid populations from increasing.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityXiao-Feng Liu, Xiang-Shun Hu, Mike A. Keller, Hui-Yan Zhao, Yun-Feng Wu, Tong-Xian Liu-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science-
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2014 Liu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106639-
dc.subjectAnimals-
dc.subjectAphids-
dc.subjectLuteovirus-
dc.subjectTriticum-
dc.subjectPlant Diseases-
dc.subjectHost-Pathogen Interactions-
dc.titleTripartite interactions of Barley Yellow Dwarf virus, Sitobion avenae and wheat varieties-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0106639-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidKeller, M. [0000-0003-0721-9753]-
Appears in Collections:Agriculture, Food and Wine publications
Aurora harvest 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_86349.pdfPublished version1.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.